Dec 17, For example, are you absolutely certain that abortion is immoral under all circumstances? Are you Writing Commons, Rogerian Argument. The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, The following is an example of how the introduction of a Rogerian argument can . Now that you have had the chance to learn about Rogerian arguments, it's time to Below, you'll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA. The conclusion is the last paragraph of the Rogerian paper that sums up and analyses the discussed ideas. There are four main objectives this strategy is aimed at:. Put like this, in such a simple and reductive how to write the title of an article, the process link attaining and expressing Rogerian understanding seems almost easy. Based on your peers' and teacher's responses to your work, what goals will you set for your next writing assignment? Share Flipboard Email. Essentially, the Rogerian problem-solving approach reconceptualizes our goals when we argue. The most important thing, which makes it so unique, is that it has practical application. Rhetoric Rhetorical Appeals Rhetorical Situation. What consensus can your establish? Instead, explain the scope and complexity of the issue. Consequently, you should not sell yourself short when presenting your position. Introduction What were the reasons for bombing the two industrial cities of Japan during the WW2? While "classical" arguments try to prove the correctness of one point of view and disprove the opinions of the opposition, the Rogerian argument is aimed to reach a consensus. Response Essay Sample. When presenting your case and the case of the other side, the style is flexible with how you set up your information and how long you spend on each section. Your position : Present your position objectively. In other words, the Rogerian argument looks at the idea from different sides and does not categorically deny any of them. Again, using the racial profiling example above, both sides desire a safer society, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race; an effective start would be to use more screening technology on public transportation. Search WritingCommons. Because awareness of the opinions https://duderesearch.com/how-to-write-a-petition-letter-for-college.html fears of your audience is so crucial to successfully negotiating differences among competing positions, you need to try to "become" your audience. Before submitting your essay to your peers or teacher, read it aloud to yourself several times. With that goal in mind, our society deserves better security measures than merely searching a person who appears a bit click the following article. At first sight, it seems very hard to keep the balance when a temptation to win an argument is so high. Order now. The analysis of the personal diary of President Freeman shows that the decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki was timely and was not supported by the Chicago University scientists who developed the bomb. After scanning a Rogerian argument essay example, one would notice that the content and the precise construction of the paper plays the main role. Whenever you feel angry or defensive, take a deep breath and look for points in which you can agree with or understand your opponents. A wide-eyed glance at students at the university center on my campus, for instance, will show you Chinese students working alongside students from Africa and South America. Conclusion Historically-wise, the decision of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki was rather an attempt of military power demonstration rather than a necessary step for finishing the WW2. They will question the validity of your evidence and test the logic of your conclusions. You should present an equal number of arguments for both parts of the debate. You could use Rogerian approaches to encourage your classmates and other students at your school to be more sympatheticabout social problems such as poverty and ecological issues. To discuss https://duderesearch.com/sociology-discussion-topics.html position with the opposition, you need to tone that down and break it into objective elements, so the sides can more easily see areas of common ground. Inbest homepage sites psychologist Carl Rogers gave a talk at the Centennial Conference on Communications at Northwestern University that changed the way we think about argument. When presenting your case and the case of the other side, the style is flexible with how you set up your information and how long you spend on each section. Have I presented my position clearly and accurately? As Young, Becker, and Pike write, "Rogerian argument has no conventional structure; in fact, users of the strategy deliberately avoid conventional persuasive structures and techniques because these devices tend to produce a sense of threat. Have I successfully limited my analysis and elaborated on one specific, significant claim? Your main goal is to establish a partnership with your readers or your opponents, not to show your superiority. Instead, explain the scope and complexity of the issue. Imagine how much better this world would be if all of us would seek a peaceful compromise, not an ultimate victory. Benefits : Appeal to the opposition and show how elements of your position could work to benefit its interests. Have I thoroughly reviewed the strengths of my opponent's counterarguments? Summarize each side, then provide a middle path. Imagine that a teacher assigns to write a Rogerian style essay and does not explain the details. After viewing the problem from your roommate's perspective, you might even be willing to explore how your problem with compulsive neatness is itself a problem. Actually, Carl Rogers was not the one who invented how to write the title of an article conflict-solving strategy. In addition to making notes on criticisms of your text and ideas for improving it, you may find the following criteria-based format a useful way of identifying and correcting any weaknesses in your peers' drafts or your own. Instead of assuming that an author or speaker shoudl hope to overcome an antagonistic audience with shrewd reasoning, the Rogerian approach would have the author or speaker attempt to reach some common ground with the audience. If you are one of these students, don't be surprised. In fact, his official letter to Freeman, Churchill, and Stalin was ignored due to the desire to see the power of the bombs. Since the goal of Rogerian argument is to find a common ground between two opposing positions, you must identify the shared beliefs or assumptions of each side. Are there any on-campus or work-related problems that I wish to exampe The writing process arguent behind. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. In order to find common ground, you should firstly determine what divides you and your opponent. What were the reasons for bombing the two industrial cities of Japan during the WW2? Challenge Yourself to Risk Change Rather than masking your thoughts behind an "objective persona," the Rogerian approach allows you to express your true feelings. Philosophers have challenged us to recognize that our worlviews - our assumptions about reality, what is good, what is possible - are influenced by our day-to-day experiences. For example, do I want to convince skiers that short skis have carved up the visit web page in an ugly way? Don't worry! Read more summary of the two sides will be your first two body paragraphs. Opposing position : State the opinion of your opposition in an objective manner that's fair and accurate, so the "other side" knows that you understand its position. Ask people with different viewpoints from yours to critique your work. Students who study humanities or social sciences often need to write a Rogerian essay based on this strategy. In such a manner, your essay will be well-structured and harmonic. An essay modeled on Rogers's approach should include a few particular parts: a discussion of the problem from both points of view that uses value-neutral language a discussion of the writer's opponent's point of view and a selection of facts or assertions the writer might be willing to concede to his opponent a discussion of the writer's point of view and a selection of facts or assertions the writer's opponent might be able to accept about his point of view a thesis that establishes a compromise between these two points of view and represents concessions from both the writer and his opponent Analyzing Pertinent Conventions Below are some of the strategies that you can use to negotiate consensus between opposing parties. First and foremost, you have to be willing to try it, and not many people are. We stress here that these are only tasks, not stages of the argument.